IP over ATM is uniquely suited to providing differentiated IP–VPN services to end-user business customers. The fundamental technology differentiator that makes this possible is the VCs that allow a service provider to provision, manage, monitor, and bill for an end-to-end connection that has a specific CoS for a specific customer. In addition, the built-in traffic-management and QoS parameters allow the adoption of IP SLAs for the first time. Combining IP with other ATM services also provides significant advantages in terms of mixing many different types of transport services (frame relay, cell relay, circuit emulation, voice services, SMDS) and different media (data, voice, video) and managing them as part of the same infrastructure.
PoS is a good solution for efficiently transporting bulk, undifferentiated IP–only traffic from point to point. It is not, however, suitable for providing end-to-end IP–based services such as VPNs. Future standards such as MPLS and new protocols such as RSVP and L2TP may allow service providers to offer VPNs with guaranteed service levels, but it is unclear when or if they will be able to work together, or if these networks will be manageable when they grow to accommodate hundreds of thousands of VPNs. In addition, networks of such complexity are not likely to be adapted to anything other than IP–based traffic. If and when all IP networks become a reality, and if the emerging standards are ratified to provide ATM–like traffic-and-network-management features, PoS may become a viable solution for providing true differentiated IP–based services.



