International Engineering Consortium
Web ProForums
High-Availability Considerations for Softswitch-Based Networks

6. Conclusions

The effective deployment of the new network office must account for a variety of potential failures that we have identified. However, the likelihood of different failures should be considered when evaluating various architecture options:

  • Since the network is the most frequent area for failures, a robust network architecture is a critical component of the network office—the distributed softswitch architecture.
  • High availability requires multiple yet independent network paths between all components. In the event of a network path failure, communication must be re-established in a very short amount of time without sacrificing reliability. Protocols that rapidly switch communication between interfaces (e.g., SCTP) are necessary pieces of a solution.
  • Software failures are overcome with redundant systems that are able to execute different software versions, yet interoperate and fail-over in a matter of seconds.
  • Hardware failures are also overcome with redundant systems in a cost-effective manner. While fault-tolerant hardware does offer an additional level of comfort, its cost-benefit equation is still debatable. The additional cost may not be deemed worthwhile since the required functionality can be delivered via other mechanisms.

In conclusion, a softswitch architecture based upon redundant systems and network redundancy can deliver the high availability required of the critical next-generation network systems.

Registered Users
Enjoy exclusive access to free On-Line Education and receive the biweekly IEC newsletter.

IEC Newsletter
Get the latest industry information including critical insights from key industry leaders, technology briefings, and an Analyst Corner.
Current
Subscribe

Newsroom

IEC Corporate Member

Advertising Kit